๐Ÿ›๏ธ Architectural Styles

111 words
1 min read
Python Week 1: the first filter for runtime behavior
Visual companion
Python
Type and operator map

Python Week 1: the first filter for runtime behavior

View
Revision summary

What this note is really saying

Short form

# ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Architectural Styles ## 1. ๐ŸŽฏ Learning Objectives - Compare architectural styles with trade-offs - Design microservices decomposition - Apply event-driven patterns ## 2.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Architectural Styles

1. ๐ŸŽฏ Learning Objectives

  • Compare architectural styles with trade-offs
  • Design microservices decomposition
  • Apply event-driven patterns

2. ๐Ÿ“– Core Content

3.1 Layered Architecture

Presentation โ†’ Business Logic โ†’ Persistence โ†’ Database Pros: Separation of concerns, testability, clear dependencies. Cons: Performance overhead, potential for tight coupling between layers.

3.2 Microservices

Each service: independently deployable, owns data, communicates via APIs. Pros: Independent scaling, team autonomy, technology flexibility. Cons: Distributed complexity, network overhead, data consistency challenges.

3.3 Event-Driven Architecture

Components communicate asynchronously via events. Decoupled, scalable, good for real-time systems. Pattern: Event โ†’ Event Bus โ†’ Event Handlers Join Discord PreviousGit & CI/CDNextRefactoring
Document outline

Keep your place and jump directly to a heading.

Table of contents

No note selected

Open a chapter to see its outline, backlinks, and sources here.