Quiz 2

Uncountable Sets and Cantor's Theorem

159 words
1 min read
Python Week 1: the first filter for runtime behavior
Visual companion
Python
Type and operator map

Python Week 1: the first filter for runtime behavior

View
Revision summary

What this note is really saying

Short form

# Uncountable Sets and Cantor's Theorem ## Cantor's Diagonal Argument The set of real numbers $\mathbb{R}$ is uncountable. **Proof:** Assume $\mathbb{R}$ is countable.

Uncountable Sets and Cantor's Theorem

Cantor's Diagonal Argument

The set of real numbers R\mathbb{R} is uncountable. Proof: Assume R\mathbb{R} is countable. List all reals in (0,1)(0,1) as a sequence r1,r2,r3,r_1, r_2, r_3, \dots. Each rir_i has decimal expansion 0.ai1ai2ai30.a_{i1}a_{i2}a_{i3}\dots. Construct b=0.b1b2b3b = 0.b_1b_2b_3\dots where bi=5b_i = 5 if aii5a_{ii} \neq 5, else bi=6b_i = 6. Then bb differs from every rir_i at the ii-th decimal place, so bb is not in the list. Contradiction. \square

Cantor's Theorem

For any set AA, A<P(A)|A| < |\mathcal{P}(A)|. Proof: The map f:AP(A)f: A \to \mathcal{P}(A) defined by f(a)={a}f(a) = \{a\} is injective, so AP(A)|A| \leq |\mathcal{P}(A)|. To show strict inequality, suppose a bijection g:AP(A)g: A \to \mathcal{P}(A) exists. Define B={aA:ag(a)}B = \{a \in A : a \notin g(a)\}. Then BP(A)B \in \mathcal{P}(A), so B=g(b)B = g(b) for some bAb \in A. But bB    bg(b)=Bb \in B \iff b \notin g(b) = B, contradiction. \square Join Discord PreviousCardinality and CountabilityNextCombinatorics & Probability
Document outline

Keep your place and jump directly to a heading.

Table of Contents
System Normal // Awaiting Context

Intelligence Hub

Navigate the knowledge graph to generate context. The Hub adapts dynamically to surface backlinks, related notes, and metadata insights.